False history as a colonial weapon of soft power
C. K. Raju
Indian Institute of Education
G. D. Parikh Centre, J. P. Naik Bhavan
Mumbai University Kalina Campus
Table of Contents
- False history as a colonial weapon of soft power
- Introduction
- Colonial soft power
- Education system
- Today, as mental slaves Indians have lost the freedom
- Who can change the education system?
- Ordinary people don't understand
- Very foolish to blame only Macaulay,
- Colonial education came a CHURCH education
- False history a stock part of church propaganda
- Systematically false history since 5th c.
- Systematically false history of SCIENCE
- Made translation of these texts theologically correct
- People fell for (secular) false history
- Gullible colonized NEVER cross-checked that false history
- We believe in these false gods of science
- False history affects teaching
- HPS taboo
- Difficult to cross-check today
- Trick No. 1: vast secondary literature
- Trick no. 2: mixing history and philosophy
- Trick No. 3: Teaching ignorance
- Thus, colonial education supposedly came for science
- Ignorance forces people to rely on authority
- What can be done
- Conclusions
Introduction
Primary question
- Q. How did a handful of Britishers rule over a vast country like India for so long?
- The British (or other Europeans) did NOT come with a huge army.
- Until the 18th c. due to bad navigation and disease each trip to India left 30% dead.
- Indians had better numbers, better steel technology, better ships, better cannons etc.
Military weakness of the would-be colonizer
- For example, the Governor of the British East India Company prostrated himself before Aurangzeb to beg for pardon (for Child's war)
- When the pirate Avery attacked Aurangzeb's ship Ganj-i-Sawai he threatened to retaliate against Bombay,
- the frightened British parliament declared Avery hostis humanis generis (enemy of humanity)
- and paid a fine to persuade Aurangzeb that the British East India Company was not involved.
259 years
- It took over 250 years for Europeans to win their first serious military victory
- [From Vasco da Gama's arrival (1498) to the "Battle of Plassey" (1757)]
- Even that 1757 battle was won by bribing part of the opposing army, NOT superior technology
- The weakness persisted: British rule was easily overthrown in the uprising of 1857.
But colonizer had a new weapon
- used soft power to make up for weakness in hard power.
- The soft power was provided by the church.
- Colonial rule involved the state-church partnership: hard power + soft power.
Indians never understood that soft power
- Hence, that soft power persists long after political independence.
Clarification: The church is a POLITICAL entity
- distinct from the religion Christianity which it claims to represent.
- The church ruled for a over a thousand years without weapons,
- with the help of myths and superstitions.
- The colonised never imagined that myths and superstitions could be spread through math and science.
Many misconceptions about soft power
- Most people swallowed the STORY that science is at war with the church (e.g. Galileo).
- Also, eating Indian food or practising "yogaaa" does NOT generate soft power for India
- Power is about control.
- Colonial soft power comes from control of the mind of the colonized.
Colonial soft power
Education system
- Control of the mind comes through the education system.
- prolonged indoctrination (10-21 years, starting from a young age)
- We fell victims to colonial/church propaganda (used e.g. by Macaulay) about "Western origin of science"
- and for science allowed the colonizer/church free access to shape the minds of our future generations.
Today, as mental slaves Indians have lost the freedom
- to modify the education system, especially in math, as we saw in my earlier talk.
- We are gripped by the superstition that the church's axiomatic method of reasoning (as in rational theology) is "superior"
- using the crusading myth of "Euclid" as a facade.
Who can change the education system?
- Not the students (they are threatened with failure/punishment).
- Not the teachers (they are forced to follow the syllabus).
- Not the the bureaucracy (NCERT),
- Not politicians (too ignorant and afraid to change it e.g. Smrti Irani, Satpal Singh and my open speech),
- Not professional mathematicians (in the current system) whose livelihood depends on it.
Ordinary people don't understand
- how the mind was captured with invisible bonds,
- unlike the shackles of physical slavery or victory in war.
- In India, people typically blame Macaulay
- for the colonial education system.
Very foolish to blame only Macaulay,
- for the SAME education system is found in ALL colonies:
- Malaysia, Lebanon (French), South Africa, Suriname (Dutch), Brazil (Portuguese), Argentina (Spanish).
- Without a correct understanding of causes, there is no cure.
Colonial education came a CHURCH education
- Not only mission schools, but
- all major Western universities, such as Paris, Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard were started by the church.
- E.g. church steeple is highest point in Harvard square: every European university has one.
False history a stock part of church propaganda
- From the time of its first religious war with "pagans" (4th-6th c. CE)
- the church got politicised and used secular propaganda (against those who rejected Christian beliefs).
Systematically false history since 5th c.
- Orosius (5th c.) wrote a false History Against the Pagans
- during the first religious war waged by the church against "pagans".
- to argue that the Christian god rewarded Christians also in this very world.
Systematically false history of SCIENCE
- This method of using false history for secular propaganda
- went viral during the Crusades and Inquisition
- when a false history OF SCIENCE was invented
- to claim an early Greek origin of all knowledge in Arabic books.
Made translation of these texts theologically correct
- Hence, the Arabic books were not burnt but translated
- and used as texts in the first European universities.
- This false history of science was later carried forward by racist and colonial historians
- to assert White/Western superiority.
People fell for (secular) false history
- especially of science which seemed plausible.
- The colonised learnt to worship false gods of science.
Gullible colonized NEVER cross-checked that false history
- Not when education system was changed 2 centuries ago
- REFUSE to do so today, 75 years after independence.
- NCERT's official stand: WRONG to cross-check Western history! (Questioning the master?)
- Says it MUST be accepted WITHOUT primary evidence by Indians (e.g. Euclid in class IX text).
We believe in these false gods of science
- Copernicus, Newton etc. because colonial education indoctrinates us with stories.
- But no one knows the actual evidence for Euclid or Pythagoras.
- Anyone? There is a Rs 2 lakh prize for primary evidence of Euclid!
False history affects teaching
- Or the real origin of calculus, needed for technology,
- (theft of calculus made it so difficult to understand today).
- Children just believe all the false stories told in our school texts
- and they are in awe of the West.
HPS taboo
- Because false history was a source of power the history and philosophy of science(HPS) is taboo
- was never taught to the colonised by the coloniser.
- And this did not change after independence: not a single university department for HPS in the country,
- because no one understood the trick of using false history for soft power.
Difficult to cross-check today
- because various further tricks were used
- to preserve this false history.
Trick No. 1: vast secondary literature
- A huge amount of secondary literature has been built up over the centuries.
- Google and you are taken to Wikipedia which reinforces that false history citing secondary sources.
Trick no. 2: mixing history and philosophy
- History of science NOT like history of war.
- Philosophical issue are used:
- e.g. "Pythagorean theorem" so-called NOT because Pythagoras did it first
- but because Pythagoras purportedly did something philosophically "superior" (gave an axiomatic proof).
Trick No. 3: Teaching ignorance
- Since church power flows from (propagandist) narratives
- to preserve the false narratives, colonial education teaches ignorance.
Thus, colonial education supposedly came for science
- but actually made the colonized ignorant of even WHY 1+1=2 (axiomatically)
- (my "Cape Town Challenge")
- That is called Bantuization
- teach only what the colonized "need to know", and they are happy with that!
Ignorance forces people to rely on authority
- and colonial education teaches them to trust only Western authority
- and distrust all others.
- You believe a PhD in math from Cambridge knows math (and will be honest)
- Check it. Try my Cape Town challenge (1+1=2) on Pervin Sinclair, former Director of NCERT.
What can be done
Avoid silly counter-propaganda
- Obviously false stories like "Vedic math" or ancient Indian spacecraft etc. are pathetic responses
- They only make people laugh.
- Deep research and study is needed.
- Why doesn't the AWC initiate and set up an HPS unit?
New HPS curriculum
- E.g. I anchored a 1 week international workshop to
- design a decolonised curriculum in HPS
- and repeatedly taught an HPS course in Malaysia
- (2 min 27 sec video of students' responses).
How false history of science is preserved
- After spreading the false belief that science is Western in origin
- this is preserved by (1) the taboo against non-Western HPS (2) mixing history and philosophy, (3) teaching ignorance etc.
- The only way to break this is public debate (not easy).
Indian tradition of public debate
- very useful to expose false "experts".
- To change the education system,
- we need real experts,
- not merely those deemed "experts" on the existing system of education.
Conclusions
- A systematically false history of science was used to put the colonized in awe of the colonizer.
- The colonized never checked that false history, and refuse to do so today.
- Anyway, though colonial education supposedly came for science, the colonized remain ignorant of even why 1+1=2.
- Therefore, they judge truth by trusting Western authority (and distrust others).
- The sole escape from this trap is public debate (if possible).